
Not all Claim Products are Equal
Grass Roots was shocked to hear that at least one claims management company was advising clients to cease repayments and potentially putting these clients at extreme risk.
Grass Roots recently discovered that a certain claims management company was advising clients to cease repayments solely on the basis of their own internal audit report.
Upon giving this advice, this claims management company would receive its 'back end' fee, in addition to the significant upfront fee that the client had already paid. What does this potentially mean for the clients involved?
The Positive Outlook
The best case scenario is that the lender will take no action, agreeing with the claims management company's own internal (non independent) audit. The client will have paid an upfront fee and now needs to find the funds to pay this particular firm's 'back end' fee, a fee that we understand is due in full and cannot be paid via instalments.
The Worst Case Scenario
A far 'scarier' potential outcome is that the lender contests the claims management company's audit and threatens court action against the client. With three key parts of the Grass Roots Defended Claim product missing (i.e. there are no solicitors, no ATE insurance already in place, no Indemnity Guarantee Insurance), the client could end up losing significant amounts of money as:
The Grass Roots Defended Claim service has been created in partnership with solicitors and insurers on an exclusive basis. Remember, not all claims management services are equal.

